Check your YouTube metadata against SEO best practices — description length, hashtags, timestamps, and keyword usage. Aligned with the monetization readiness checker guide — everything works in your browser, no login needed.
📖 Want the full guide with examples and expert tips?
Read the Complete Guide →This checker tells you exactly how close your channel is to YouTube Partner Program eligibility and what is still missing. It evaluates the three YPP requirements — subscribers, watch hours, and policy compliance — against your current numbers.
Why this matters: YouTube's algorithm is a feedback loop — better metadata earns more impressions, more impressions surface your retention, and strong retention expands reach further. Tools like this one exist to make sure you are optimizing every variable in that loop, on every upload, without needing a consultant's budget. Used consistently, the small gains from each check compound into a channel that ranks.
The YT SEO Architect approach is deliberately simple: run the check, apply the result, move on. No dashboards to babysit, no credits to count. If you pair this tool with the matching guide on the blog, you get the "why" behind every "what" — the benchmarks, the examples, and the mistakes to avoid — so you are never applying advice blindly.
The standard path requires 1,000 subscribers and 4,000 valid public watch hours in the past 12 months. The Shorts path requires 1,000 subscribers and 10 million Shorts views in 90 days. You also need no active strikes and a linked AdSense account.
Yes — the Shorts-only path replaces the 4,000 watch-hour requirement with 10 million Shorts views in 90 days. Revenue from Shorts uses a different pool but still requires the same 1,000-subscriber gate.
The checker shows exactly which threshold is unmet. The most common blocker is watch hours on channels that publish Shorts only, or subscriber counts that stall after packaging quality drops.
It covers one specific lever in the optimization stack. Use it alongside the title, description, tag, and thumbnail tools for a complete pre-publish checklist, then validate the results against your YouTube Studio analytics over the following weeks.
Yes — the recommendations are size-agnostic because they follow YouTube's ranking fundamentals, which apply equally to a 100-subscriber channel and a million-subscriber channel. What changes with size is how fast results show, not whether the optimization is correct.